In the age of the internet and all things public, it might feel like your right to snap photos anytime is absolute. But is it? Let’s take a look issues surrounding privacy in regards to photography and videography.
Contrary to what popular photo-sharing programs like Instagram, Facebook, Imgur, and Snapchat might lead you to believe, a number of state laws are specifically designed to protect against unwelcome photographic intrusion into personal affairs. Check your jurisdiction, but typically, if you intentionally intrude on a person’s private affairs and a reasonable person would find your intrusion offensive, then it is not ok. The problem with this definition is that states often have trouble agreeing on when there is an expectation of privacy. Do you have an expectation of privacy at home? At work? At school? In public? And what can be done with any images that are taken? It depends.
As you might have guessed, the expectation of privacy is highest when at home. Our homes are our sanctuary, and the law recognizes this. This expectation is virtually absolute when we are inside, and especially when curtains are drawn and we’ve taken steps to keep the public eye out. Devices that enhance the ability to see onto your property such as magnifying lenses, highly sensitive microphones, or other enhanced technologies cannot be used to capture pictures, videos or sounds. The expectation of privacy falls slightly when you walk outside; aerial views and images of you on your property are legal, so long as the photographer did not need to trespass to obtain them.
At work, your expectation may be dictated by the employee handbook, office layout, or even prior consent. Depending on the expectations your company sets, everything may be fair game. Private companies are (mostly) free to do as they please, and may not guarantee privacy anywhere within their walls. As such, photos and video surveillance may be allowed.
In school, while many parents might be uncomfortable with other students or teachers photographing their child, it is not inherently illegal. The use of such photographs, like all others, will be limited by purpose, but taking the images generally is not.
Public places have the lowest levels of protection. Generally, everything is fair game. That said, videotaping and publishing images solely to cause embarrassment or to expose conversations reasonably believed to be private by the participant (i.e., with a paramedic after an accident) are still likely protected. When in doubt, assess the situation as a whole, and try to put yourself in the subject’s shoes. Before you go capturing an image, consider where you are, what you had to do to get the perfect shot, and how likely it is that the image(s) may cause the subject distress.
Even if you’ve taken an image that doesn’t violate anyone’s reasonable expectation of privacy, you can’t use them for commercial purposes without authorization. As we previously discussed, using an image without express consent and understanding from the subject may leave you open to legal liability. This applies to photographs you took, were given, or found on the internet. (Internet finds come with a whole slew of other issues, and any reproduction or use should generally be avoided.)
There is one caveat to the general rule against appropriation: journalists may use their images for newsworthy purposes. While police or other interest groups may discourage photography they fear will be published, they cannot actually prevent it.
***If you want to use your images for commercial purposes such as advertising, be sure to get the proper release, in writing, from the subject or legal guardian.
Written and maintained by the LegalShield content team, covering legal and identity protection topics for individuals, families, and small businesses.
It’s usually much easier for families to settle an estate with a Will than without one. The term for dying without a Will is intestate. When this happens, state laws determine the distribution of an estate, not the person who has passed or the people they care about. If you’re trying to settle an intestate estate, consider seeking legal guidance.
In this guide, you can find more information on conservatorship vs. guardianship, as well as alternatives to these options.
Unilateral is a common descriptor for contracts that means “one-sided.” Rest assured that in most situations, a lawyer can worry about contract interpretations for you, but read on to find out more.
A Beneficiary Deed is a legal document where you name someone to get your real estate after you die. In many states, it’s also called a Transfer-on-Death Deed (TODD). This type of deed can help property pass to a named beneficiary without the hassle of probate.
Your daughter just went off to college and became ill. She goes to the doctor, and they want to see certain records from her childhood, such as shot records. She calls you and asks you to call the family’s long-time pediatrician to acquire the records. No problem – right? You call, and the office tells you that since your child is 18, you are no longer allowed access to her records. Your child is an adult and as a parent, you have lost your authority.
In general, the answer is no, you can’t get a divorce for free. That may be disappointing news if you’re interested in a free divorce, but the good news is, there are ways to lower costs.
Let's walk through how much it costs to change your name by situation, what you'll pay to update your documents, and how to keep your total expenses as low as possible.
Before you decide what to do about a traffic ticket, take a breath and seek some advice. Every situation is different, so ask a lawyer to explain your options.
